Do I really have to defend Hillary?
Look people, Hillary is a sneaky, conniving, power-hungry, evil, spawn-of-Satan, dirty-dealing snake in the grass waiting to swallow hole anyone who crosses her path.
However, this whole controversy over her saying that “Bobby Kennedy got killed in June” as some sort of implication that Obama might be assassinated is a little much. She wasn’t even talking about Obama, but trying to justify why she was still in the race by pointing out that campaigning in June wasn’t unheard of…Of course, the two she mentioned started their campaigns only in March, but that’s not the point. The point is that whether she intended to suggest Obama’s assassination or not, one cannot draw that conclusions based on her remarks. This whole controversy is just another example of the liberal media reading too much into a comment and twisting it around to make the person who said it look bad, while making their favorite candidate look like a victim. It’s quite ridiculous.
I’m pretty sure Hillary Clinton has enough weak spots that the media shouldn’t have to attack her on something that takes a giant leap of politicaly correct illogic. Then again, if they actually went after her on something of substance (like policy issues or her ability to twist facts around or even completely lie or who she associates with), they’d risk opening their candidate, Pretty Boy Obama, up to the same attacks of substance. So they have to go the ultra-PC route.
Grow up. Sheesh.
